Showing posts with label Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Show all posts

Monday, 6 January 2014

Co-op Bank execs face BoE investigation

The Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority have confirmed they will launch investigations into the near collapse of the Co-op Bank

Former senior managers of the Co-op Bank are to be investigated by Britain’s two financial regulators over their role in the near failure of the troubled lender that last year discovered a £1.5bn capital shortfall.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the Bank of England-run bank supervisor, and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have confirmed they have begun an “enforcement investigation” into the Co-op Bank that will look at the actions of the lender’s “former senior managers”.
The launch of the investigation follows a two-month-long joint inquiry by the PRA and the FCA into the circumstances that led to the Co-op Bank’s troubles that will see the lender’s parent, the Co-op Group, give up control of the business to its bondholders.

The investigation could lead to former manager being fined, suspended and possibly banned from working in the financial services industry. The investigation could also lead to criminal action should the officials find any evidence of wrongdoing by individuals, though this would require a separate police investigation.
The Reverend Paul Flowers, the former chairman of the Co-op Bank, is already the subject of a police investigation into his alleged drug-taking, but will now face a probe into his professional conduct while at the bank, along with other former directors and executives.
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook

Friday, 30 August 2013

Co-operative Bank reports £709m loss amid uncertainty over bad debts plan

Co-op boss says alternative to meeting regulatory requirements to cover £1.5bn shortfall is to put banking arm into administration
A thwarted attempt to become a major player in the banking industry earlier this year continued to haunt the Co-operative Group on Thursday as its bank reported a £709m loss and raised the prospect of a Northern Rock-style rescue if bondholders failed to back a £1.5bn restructuring bid.
The group, which has operations spanning funeral services to supermarkets, said there would be no quick fixes as directors conceded that shoring up the bank, which has 4.7 million customers, would involve job losses and significant restructuring of the wider group.
Richard Pym, the bank chairman, said that without new capital the banking unit "will not be a going concern".
The Co-op group's new chief executive, Euan Sutherland, said there was no plan B. The only alternative to meeting regulatory requirements to fill a £1.5bn shortfall in the bank's reserves would be a government takeover similar to the bailout of Northern Rock in 2008. Sutherland reported that losses at the bank of £709m sent the wider group into a £559m loss, compared with £18m of profits in the first half of 2012.
He blamed £496m of previously undiscovered bad debts and a £150m write-off on IT systems for the deterioration in the bank's financial situation. "It's inevitable in a restructuring of this size that there will be some jobs at risk," he said, predicting that the bank would be diminished from its current scale of 10,000 staff and 320 branches.
Sutherland said a new management team would devise a turnaround strategy with the management consultancy Oliver Wyman. Sutherland indicated that executives would receive bonuses next year despite the group's travails, saying that a remuneration plan will be announced in March that will reflect the need to retain experienced senior staff.
The Co-op's plunge into loss follows a difficult year that started with an audacious bid by its bank to buy 632 branches from Lloyds Banking Group and ended with the banking regulator insisting it abandon the deal and find £1.5bn to cover previously undisclosed bad loans.
The debacle stems from the Co-op bank's purchase of the Britannia building society in 2009, which had joined several other banks in making indiscriminate loans to corporate customers, many involved in overvalued commercial property deals.
Sutherland said the Co-op bank's bad loans were mostly accounted for by Britannia, with half of all its poorly performing retail loans and three quarters of its roughly £440m corporate bad debts blamed on over-zealous loan agreements sold by the building society.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the City regulator, said on Thursday that the scale of the losses did not alter its demand that the Co-op plug the £1.5bn hole in its balance sheet.
A rescue of the bank has the support of the Co-op's board, which is made up of 20 non-executive directors, 15 of whom are elected from regional boards and five from Independent Co-operative Societies. Sutherland said the board had considered all the options and agreed to commit £1bn of the Co-op group's funds to cover bad debts in return for a debt for equity swap by bondholders.
Bondholders ranging from pensioners to hedge funds will have to take a loss on their investment under plans for a "bail-in" in coming months.
They will be forced to contribute £500m through an "exchange offer", which will result in a stock market listing for the bank. Some 15,000 holders of Co-operative Bank bonds have written to the Bank of England's financial policy committee seeking an intervention in rescue of the bank.
Mark Taber, representing retail bondholders who believe they should be spared a haircut on their investments, said there was a "disgraceful" lack of detail in the Co-op's offer. He said: "The PRA should not allow this and should make a direction to the Co-op Bank [to alter the restructuring] accordingly."
While the Co-op's board has agreed the deal, there is likely to be much debate inside Britain's largest mutual organisation about the cost of the rescue, the prospect of running a business with a large number of shares owned by non-mutual institutions and the potential for another banking crash to wreck the wider Co-operative Group.
Sutherland, who replaced Peter Marks in May, said: "We are sorry but we are a new team and grasping the nettle and getting on with fixing the situation."

If a rescue fails

Should the Co-op fail to secure a rescue of its banking division it will fall to the government to step in.
There are several options for ministers and which one they choose will depend on the state of the Manchester-based bank.
A Northern Rock-style takeover would be the most draconian. The government purchased all the Rock's shares and made it a wholly-owned state enterprise.
A bailout of the bank would involve a large injection of cash to cover bad loans in return for partial ownership. The state owns 83% of Royal Bank of Scotland and 39% of Lloyds. In the case of Lloyds, following a £20.6bn injection of funds.
Another option was pursued in the case of Dunfermline building society, which like the Britannia building society began offering loans on risky property deals at the height of the housing boom.
Dunfermline, which was unable to raise extra funds from its members to cover bad debts, was absorbed into the Bank of England on a Friday and transferred on the following Monday to the Nationwide.
In each case the first £100,000 of individual savings are protected.
New tougher rules agreed in Brussels are due to take effect later this year, though no date has yet been set. The Recovery and Resolution Directive will force investors that lend to banks to sacrifice some of their assets as part of any rescue plan. It will also force banks to offload profitable divisions to cover losses under a so-called "living will".
The Co-op has in effect adopted the strategy put forward in the directive before it has become law, telling bondholders to sacrifice around a third of their holdings to pay a third of the £1.5bn bailout package. The Co-op group will also sell its insurance arm.
Article Source : http://www.guardian.co.uk
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike and if u want to Setup ur business in United Kingdom then  its not difficult in this modern age for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook

Thursday, 25 July 2013

Vince Cable has swallowed the bankers' line on capital

Business secretary used the phrase 'capital Taliban' to describe Bank of England officials, which was both unhelpful and wrong
Hark the words of Robert Jenkins, former external member of the Bank of England's financial policy committee, earlier this month: "I fear that the banks have bamboozled government into believing that society must choose between safety and growth, between safer banks and bank shareholder value, and between a safer financial framework and a competitive City of London. These are all false choices."
Bad news, Mr Jenkins, your fears are well founded. On the evidence ofVince Cable's extraordinary outburst to the FT, the government has indeed been well and truly bamboozled.
The business secretary used and endorsed the phrase "capital Taliban" to describe Bank of England officials. The term is bankers' favourite way to insult the Bank and, aside from bad taste, there are two reasons why a cabinet member should not use it.
First, the criticism of the Bank's Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is plain wrong: asking banks to hold more capital should not impede lending.
Second, ministers should keep their noses out of the day-to-day judgments of the independent regulator.
This row has broken out after the PRA demanded that lenders achieve leverage ratios of 3% – that is, that they should hold £3 of capital to support £100 of lending. By no stretch of the imagination can 3%, implying a 33 times levered balance sheet, be regarded as an onerous demand. The Vickers commission argued for 4%, meaning a leverage cap of 25 times, and the US is heading towards 5%.
Nor is a 3% leverage ratio for British banks hard to achieve in practice. All the main lenders apart from Nationwide and Barclays are there already. Nationwide – conceivably an institution with a "safe" book of mortgage assets – has been given until the end of 2015 to fall into line. The PRA's verdict on when Barclays must conform is awaited eagerly, making the timing of Cable's comments appalling.
The key point is that more capital and more lending go hand-in-hand, as Sir Mervyn King stressed time and again when he was governor. "Capital supports lending and provides resilience. And, without a resilient banking system, it will be difficult to sustain a recovery," King said in his last Mansion House speech.
Business secretary Vince CableCable seems to have swallowed the bankers' line that the regulator is making them assemble vast sums of capital that could otherwise be used to lend to small businesses. No, that is not how the system works: to repeat, weakly capitalised banks won't lend because they can't lend. And getting more capital into the system looks a sensible policy when the starting point is a banking industry that is still hugely over-leveraged by historical standards. As Jenkins says, we don't have to choose between safety and growth.
Of course, it suits the lenders to muddy the waters. Barclays would be unpopular with its shareholders if it had to whack them with a rights issue to find capital in a hurry. Nationwide has a particular reason to worry because it is a building society without access to shareholder capital. But the PRA's job is to manage financial stability. By speaking out, Cable makes it harder for the Bank to be seen to act independently.
What if Barclays is next week given a Nationwide-style waiver to meet the 3% ratio by the end of 2015? Would that be because the PRA is satisfied with the current financial strength of Barclays or because the regulators have been intimidated by Cable and the Treasury, which apparently shares the view that jihadists are running amok in Threadneedle Street?
Mark Carney, the new governor, should be spitting blood. He's got a tough job. He doesn't need politicians who make it harder. Cable, who in opposition was quick to spot the danger in running an under-capitalised banking system, should know better.
Article Source : http://www.guardian.co.uk
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike and if u want to Setup ur business in United Kingdom then  its not difficult in this modern age for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook