Thursday 18 July 2013

Barclays fights US electricity price manipulation fine through the courts

Bank intends to 'vigorously defend' $470m fine for allegedly manipulating electricity prices
Barclays has pledged to fight a $470m (£300m) penalty for allegedly manipulating electricity prices in California by taking the case through the US judicial system.
Faced with an order by the federal energy regulatory commission (Ferc) to pay a $435m fine and hand $35m of profits to low-income households, Barclays insisted that its trading activities had been legitimate and did not break any laws.
"We intend to vigorously defend this matter in federal court, where the Ferc will have the burden of proving its allegations and we will be able to present a balanced and full presentation of the facts," Barclays said.
The penalty from Ferc is based on allegations about Barclays' trading of electricity for two years to December 2008. It was first mooted in October and late on Monday was upheld by the Washington-based regulatorwhich gave the bank 30 days to pay the fine or appear in court. The proposed penalty is being levied at a time when the bank's new management team, led by chief executive Antony Jenkins, is attempting to rebuild its reputation following the £290m fine for rigging Libor which led Jenkins' predecessor Bob Diamond to quit the troubled bank.
The penalty from Ferc is larger than the Libor rigging fine and led to some concern among bank analysts that it could have an impact on the complex legal agreements struck by Barclays with regulators at the time of the interest rate manipulation case a year ago.
Sandy Chen, banks analyst at Cenkos, said the Ferc fine could trigger a review of the non-prosecution agreement with the department of justice from last July. He cited two elements of the agreement which stated that for two years the bank would "commit no United States crime whatsoever … and bring to the fraud section's attention all criminal or regulatory investigations, administrative proceedings or civil actions brought by any government authority in the US by or against Barclays or its employees that alleges fraud or violations of the laws governing securities and commodities markets".
Barclays to fight US power fine in the courtsThe allegations by the Ferc date back to 2008 so it was not immediately clear if they fell under the terms of the Libor agreement with the DoJ. Barclays said the allegations by the Ferc were one-sided and did not provide a "balanced and full description of the facts or the applicable legal standard".
Four former Barclays employees, Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine and Ryan Smith, are required to pay fines – $15m in the case of Brin and $1m each for the others – for building positions in the electricity market to manipulate index prices. In an 85-page document Ferc used emails between the four to set out its case, in which they talked about "propping up" an electricity index. In another Connelly is alleged to have "laughed" at suggestions he risked being reported to the commission about his activities.
Barclays argued that the correspondence had been "cherry picked".
Article Source : http://www.guardian.co.uk
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike and if u want to Setup ur business in United Kingdom then  its not difficult in this modern age for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook

Severn Trent spent £19m fending off takeover approach

Water company says higher prices across economy and 'quasi taxes' will push up its operating costs
Severn Trent has revealed that it ran up a £19m bill – almost 9% of this year's pre-tax profits – fending off a takeover approach.
The water company rejected a third and final offer in June from LongRiver Partners, a consortium of Canadian, British and Kuwaiti infrastructure investors.
Severn Trent's board decided that the proposed £5.3bn offer, at £22 a share, undervalued the future potential of the business, although LongRiver argued it was "a full and fair price" for the company, which supplies water and sewerage services to 4.2 million households in the Midlands and Wales.
In a trading statement, Severn Trent said the saga cost it £19m in "advisory, legal and other services". This is almost 9% of the pre-tax profits of £215m the company earned in the year ending 31 March.
Severn Trent's advisers included Rothschild, Citi, Barclays, Morgan Stanley and the financial PR firm Tulchan.

Severn Trent customers' bills rose by 2% on 1 April, which the company attributed to rising inflation. The statement said higher prices across the economy and "quasi taxes" would push up its operating costs.
Water companies are seen as an attractive investment because they are regulated industries with a constant demand for their services.
The failed LongRiver consortium was led by Borealis Infrastructure Management, the infrastructure investment arm of a Canadian local authority pension fund. The other members were the UK's University Superannuation Scheme and the Kuwait Investment Authority, a sovereign wealth fund.
Takeover rules bar the consortium from making a fresh bid for at least six months.
Article Source : http://www.guardian.co.uk
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike and if u want to Setup ur business in United Kingdom then  its not difficult in this modern age for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook

Bank experts back Mark Carney on not expanding QE as recovery takes hold

Policymakers seeking alternative ways to encourage growth after unanimous vote to keep QE programme at £375bn
Bank of England policymakers swung behind Mark Carney, the new governor, and voted unanimously against extending quantitative easing at this month's monetary policy committee meeting, amid signs that economic recovery is becoming "more firmly established".
David Miles and Paul Fisher, the two MPC members who had repeatedly backed Carney's predecessor Sir Mervyn King's calls for an extension of the deflation-busting policy, decided instead to switch their votes and support Carney's plan of leaving the size of the QE programme unchanged at £375bn.
The Bank's apparent retreat from QE under Carney's leadership came as Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, used an appearance before the House of Representatives to reassure financial markets that his own plans to scale down monetary stimulus were not "on a preset course", and would depend on the health of the economy.
Bernanke sparked a sharp sell-off in financial markets and a spike in bond yields in May when he suggested that the Fed would start to "taper" its $85bn a month in bond purchases as the US recovery gathers pace. But in yesterday's hearing the chairman said: "Markets are beginning to understand our message and the volatility has obviously moderated."
The minutes of the Bank of England's July MPC meeting, published on Wednesday, suggested that with the recovery still fragile, rather than halting stimulus, it was examining the idea of using a different approach to try to kick-start growth.
By August, when the chancellor has asked the Bank to decide on whether it wants to alter its policymaking remit, the MPC aims to establish "the quantum of additional stimulus required and the form it should take".
That suggests that Miles and Fisher may simply have decided to wait for next month's meeting before pushing for a fresh round of QE – or backing an alternative, such as a public promise to keep rates low until the economy meets specific targets, an approach known as "forward guidance". , which the Canadian governor is known to favour.
"An expansion of the asset purchase programme remained one means of injecting stimulus, but the committee would be investigating other options during the month, and it was therefore sensible not to initiate an expansion at this meeting," the minutes said.
Simon Wells, UK economist at HSBC, said: "We expected unanimity next month, when the MPC assesses the merits of forward guidance, but Mark Carney has already got it."
The MPC made a first foray into forward guidance at its meeting a fortnight ago, taking the unusual step of issuing a statement to financial markets warning them that interest rates were unlikely to rise.
When Carney was governor of the Canadian central bank, he pledged to keep interest rates low for 12 months, helping to calm fears in financial markets that borrowing costs were about to rise.
The minutes show that MPC members were concerned by the "surprising" rise in UK government bond yields that followed Bernanke's statement in May. In April markets had not been expecting UK interest rates to go up until late 2016; by the time the MPC met, that had been brought forward to mid-2015.
"UK developments, while broadly positive, had not been enough to warrant such an upward move in the near-term path of bank rate," the minutes said.
Bank of England governor Mark Carney plans to leave the size of the QE programme unchanged at £375bnPersistently weak real income growth – with high inflation more than outweighing paltry pay deals – was highlighted as a risk to the recovery by MPC members: "Real income growth had remained weak … and it was unlikely that consumption growth could continue at its current rate without some rise in real incomes."
However, the MPC said, "developments in the domestic economy had generally been positive", and broadly in line with the moderately upbeat picture presented by King at his final inflation report press briefing. For "most members", therefore, "the onus on policy at this juncture was to reinforce the recovery by ensuring that stimulus was not withdrawn prematurely", – subject to keeping inflation on track to hit the government's 2% target.

IMF boost for Osborne

George Osborne won a propaganda victory on Wednesday night as the IMF's powerful directors rejected its own economists' recommendations that the UK should slow the pace of spending cuts to boost recovery.
When the IMF announced the initial findings of its annual check-up of the UK economy in May, it caused a political storm by urging the chancellor to bring forward £10bn of infrastructure spending to avoid austerity becoming too much of a drag on growth.
But at a meeting on Monday, a big majority of the IMF's 24 directors – delegates from its member countries – spoke out against that proposal.
A statement released on Wednesday with the IMF's full findings on the UK, known as an Article IV, said: "Most directors underscored the importance of keeping fiscal consolidation on track to preserve credibility, not least in light of the persistent weakness of the fiscal position." However, Krishna Srinivasan, the mission chief for the IMF's UK assessment, said staff stood by their recommendations, despite the board's scepticism.
A Treasury spokesman said: "We thought they were wrong then, we still think they're wrong, and now it turns out most of the board agree with us."
But the IMF's report insisted that, "the economy remains a long way from a strong and sustainable recovery".
Article Source : http://www.guardian.co.uk
Azure Global’s vision is to be widely recognized as a reputed firm of financial business advisors, achieving real growth for ambitious companies and to become the first choice for F&A outsourcing for accountancy practices and businesses alike and if u want to Setup ur business in United Kingdom then  its not difficult in this modern age for more info visit our site Azure Global and join us also On Facebook